Military Action

In my essay I go forthing investigate the phenomenon of state of warf argon, starting with its theory and definition, and going to its factors and the principles of its unslopedification, and therefore finishing with its be. In event, I will evince go forth the factors of a well(p) war and put up each(prenominal) of them with the required argumentation. Also, I will advert the factors that must(prenominal) be considered when forces action is justified.And finally, I will mention direct and substantiative cost of war. On the whole, the purpose of my essay is to explore on the concept of just war, using the terms just war and the theory of just war and applying the concepts concepts of sovereignty, province and nation. In order to provide a necessary scientific ground for my investigation, I will reference the information from reliable sources The Internet encyclopaedia of Philosophy, exactly war Theory and the War on Terror by Brian Moresonner, and early(a)s.Fi rst, according to Brian Moresonner, the roots of the term plainly War go back to the Ancient times of Greeks and Sumerians and throughout the history of mankind the concept of just war has been developed 3, eventually growing up into a separate theory with its own principles and traditions. Moresonner in his plainly War Theory and the War on Terror (2004) points out that meaning of Just War usually evolves when deuce or to a greater extent similarly cultured muckles postulate in combat over and over, as they function the like cultural values the two or more peoples set up conventions and perhaps even codes of what is acceptable in combat with each early(a). 3.At the same time, The Internet cyclopedia of Philosophy (2005) holds that the theory of just war deals with the exculpation of how and why wars are fought. 4. This justification whoremaster be of two kinds historical or theoretical. 4. Theoretical justification deals with ethics of forms of warfare and war. 4. On the o ther hand, the historical aspect justifies rules and agreements applied in different wars across the ages. 4.Second, due to The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2005), every just war is characterized with a list of factors, which primarily should contain the following Just cause, which means a cause of attack can be considered just if it is a chemical reaction to a physical injury (e.g., a violation of territory), an irritate (an aggression against national honor), a trade trade stoppage (an aggression against economic activity), or even to a neighbors prosperity (a violation of loving justice). 4. Proclamation of war made by a proper authority. This factor implies the relationship between presidential term and people, and is closely connected with the concepts of sovereignty, state and nation. In simpler and more general terms, government, as an organ of authority in a state, can declare war. 4. The possession of good intention. This factor forbids pursuing self-interes ts or aggrandizement for the pursuit of justice in the war. 4. A reasonable materialise of success. This factor means that just cause and powerful intention are insufficient for a just war. The sides involved should calculate al the benefits and the costs of the campaign. affinity in the means which are used. This factor requires that the finish of the war must be proportional to the other principles of just cause. 4. For example, if a nation A invades a land which belonged to the nation B, nation B has by repairs to take the land back. It will be a just cause. But at the same time, the snack counter attack of B should be proportionate and taper only at retrieving the land. 4.Third, in case when the factors of a military action are taken into consideration, those ones, which will justify it, should be based on the right of self-defense. This right was established by the UN Charter, Geneva and the Hague conventions and it states that a nation can start a war is its sovereign ty is endangered. So, to my mind, justifying factors should involve 1) Direct aggression against the country, or its allies, or those countries which are not able to protect themselves against a direct aggression. Thus, in the U.S.A. current political orientation suggests self-defense as a right response to direct aggression. The main concerns of U.S. ideology here are freedom and safety of its citizens, and proportional intervention against the defender. For example, much(prenominal) war in self-defense against Japan was stated by the Statesn policy on celestial latitude 7, 1941.2) Indirect aggression against the country. However, this premise is the most arduous to evaluate. This difficulty comes out of ideological divergences of all the countries in the world. In other words, to understand how a particular country would be engaged in a war based on this premise, one must really know the ideology of this country. For instance, all the military actions of the U.S.A. initiated a fter the World War II are considered to be based on U.S. response to indirect aggression. In this case the term indirect aggression implies the controversy between capitalist and communist regimes and the competition of American democracy to dictatorship of the former U.S.S.R. and its allies.Finally, each war has its direct and indirect costs. To my mind, direct costs of war concern its human casualties and money spent by the parts involved. For example, it was estimated that during World War II 20 million o soviet people died, and the cost of Iraqi war or America has already overreached 2 million dollars. On the other hand, there are indirect costs of wars, which generally can be seen in postwar period. Among such costs I can mention refugees and immigration, poverty, return of economic and political systems, epidemics, pollution of environment, etc.Bibliography1) Carl Schmitt, The Concept of the Political, George Schwab, trans., lolly The University of Chicago Press, 1996, p. 26.2) Mark Osiel, Obeying Orders Atrocity, Military Discipline, and the Law of War, newfound Brunswick Transaction Publishers, 1999, p.100.3) Moseley Alexander. Just War Theory. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2005. 28 Aug. 2005 4)Plaff Tony. Peacekeeping and the Just War Tradition. US Army War Colege. September, 2000